← Journal · 27 May 2026
The hardest weapon to nerf was my own ego
Running Kouvola taught me something I didn't want to learn — my code's idea of 'balanced' and my players' experience of it are not the same thing. Here's what changed when I stopped arguing.
By Jalo Tuomi

The first time a player told me my balance was broken, I argued with them.
I'd spent hours on those numbers. Loot drop rates, shop prices, weapon damage, ability cooldowns — all of it tuned, checked, sitting in a spreadsheet that made perfect sense. So when someone with a few hundred hours in Kouvola told me a weapon was busted, my honest first reaction was: no, I did the math, you're wrong.
They weren't wrong. They're almost never wrong.
The gap between "balanced" and "feels balanced"
Here's the thing nobody really prepares you for as a developer: you can build the entire world, write every rule, set every number — and the people living inside it will still understand it better than you do.
Not because they're smarter. Because they're in there. Grinding for hours. Feeling the friction. Noticing the weapon that's quietly ruining every match while I'm staring at a damage value thinking "that looks fine to me."
My code has one idea of what "balanced" means. The lobby has another. And the lobby is the one that counts — because the lobby is where the game actually happens.

What I actually changed
I stopped defending my spreadsheet.
Now, when something feels off, I go straight to the source. I ask the community: what's annoying? What's overpowered? What would you change about the loot pool, the prices, the buffs and nerfs? And then — the part that took me longest — I actually change it. Not a token 2% tweak so I can tell myself I listened. Real changes, based on what they tell me.
It's been the single best decision I've made on the live side of the game.
The part I didn't see coming
I expected the game to get better. It did.
What I didn't expect was what it did to the community.
When players see their feedback go live — when the thing they complained about last week is fixed this week — something shifts. It stops being "the dev's game" that they happen to play. It becomes theirs. They argue about balance in the comments like it's their own project. They defend it to newcomers. They bring friends.
I basically handed a piece of the design back to the people who live in the game. And it turns out they're excellent custodians of it — because they care about it as much as I do.

Where I've landed
My code still says one thing. A 14-year-old with 200 hours says another. And more often than not, I've learned to bet on the kid.
That's not me giving up on having a vision. I still decide what the game is — the identity, the direction, the line in the sand. But the moment-to-moment feel, the stuff that decides whether a match is fun or frustrating? That's a conversation, not a monologue.
The hardest weapon to nerf was my own ego.
Worth every patch.
— Jalo
Share this post